JOINT STOCK COMPANIES IN TÜRKİYE

Authority Can Be Delegated. Responsibility Usually Stays Nearby.

Joint stock companies are one of the most structured corporate models under Turkish Commercial Law.

At the same time, they also provide enormous flexibility in management structure. But flexibility does not mean immunity.

Especially for board members and senior executives. Because in practice, signing authority often means personal responsibility follows right behind it.

The Board Is Not Just a Formality

Under Turkish Commercial Code Article 553, board members, executives, founders, and liquidators may become personally liable if they violate their legal or contractual duties through fault.

Which means:

board signatures are not decorative.

And board resolutions are definitely not random paperwork.

In many disputes, the real battlefield becomes:

board resolution books

internal directives

delegation structures

signature authorities

registered duty distributions

Sometimes one sentence inside an old board resolution suddenly becomes the most important document in the entire file.

Delegation Exists. But Not Magically.

Turkish law allows delegation of management and representation authority.

This may include:

financial limits

regional authority divisions

subject-specific powers

executive delegation structures

For example: contracts above a certain amount may require board approval

export authority may belong to one executive

domestic operations may belong to another

certain regions may be assigned separately

And yes, these details matter much more than most companies initially think.

Because years later, someone will almost certainly say:

“This was not my responsibility.” At that point, the company will need actual documentation instead of collective memory.

The General Manager Problem

General managers are not automatically mandatory corporate organs under Turkish law.

But once authority is delegated properly, they may carry responsibilities almost identical to board members within their assigned areas. And public debts create an even bigger issue. Under Turkish tax and public collection regulations, legal representatives may become personally liable for unpaid:

tax debts

SGK (Turkish Social Security Institution) obligations

public receivables

Even with their own personal assets.

Which is usually the moment where the phrase “limited liability” starts feeling slightly less limited.

Authority Without Documentation Is Dangerous

One of the most common practical problems is this:

companies verbally distribute authority

everybody “kind of knows” who handles what

nothing is documented properly

nothing is registered correctly

Then a crisis appears.

Suddenly nobody officially handled anything.

Courts and public authorities generally dislike that situation very much.

Criminal Liability Exists Too

Certain violations create direct criminal exposure.

False declarations, misleading documents, unauthorized public fundraising activities, accounting manipulations, and similar acts may trigger personal criminal responsibility.

And “I did not know” is not always a strong defense for executives.

Especially if signatures exist.

Shareholders vs Managers

Ordinary shareholders in joint stock companies are generally liable only up to their committed capital contributions.

That protection still largely exists.

But once a shareholder also becomes:

a board member

a legal representative

an authorized signatory

an executive decision-maker

the legal landscape changes considerably.

Risk Management Matters More Than Motivation Speeches

Well-organized companies usually survive crises much more comfortably.

Which means: authority structures should be written clearly

delegations should be registered properly

board resolutions should be drafted carefully

opposition votes should be recorded when necessary

financial and tax obligations should be monitored constantly

And perhaps most importantly:

companies should stop treating signature authority like a prestige title.

Because sometimes the most dangerous sentence inside a company is:

“Just sign it quickly.”

Joint stock companies provide excellent flexibility for corporate management.

But Turkish law expects something in return: clarity.

Final Note

A joint stock company is probably the most suitable corporate structure for limiting managerial responsibility through proper delegation and internal organization.

But those limits only exist if the structure is actually documented, registered, and announced properly.

Otherwise, responsibility has a habit of finding its way back very quickly.

Praemonitus praemunitus.

Forewarned is forearmed.

Before accepting authority inside a company, define your responsibility area with surgical precision.

Because one day, you may need to say:

“This was not my responsibility.”

And when that day comes, it is much better to have legally binding documents instead of only good intentions and fading memories.

Full original article is available in Turkish on this website. https://onurpug.av.tr/blog/anonim-irketlerde-yneticiler-ve-ortaklar-yetkinin-erevesi-sorumluluun-sinirlari